Society in Your Eyes

By Anggoron Azid

The facet’s of life is just more than what it truly seems to be. I observe, I feel and I sense but what pure knowledge is actually pure in the sense of the word. Would it not be true that what one is unable to even imagine to question would truly be the journey to finding pure knowledge itself.

Scattered we are in all corners of the globe just to discover that going bouts one’s own method of survival is what many believe to be the main issue at hand. Yes, but to what extent is such form of thought able to find what cannot be found.

The shaping of the ways of how one thinks is just the beginning to actually seclude the true potential of all inhabitants itself. What disagreements of current times really give true meaning to the sense of just living in the first place?

If yonder discovers much which can not be than following norms which only leads to what is to be the right form of knowledge may in actual sense be the opposite. What many perceive to be the main importance of life itself may actually be the main factor in insuring that the true journey of discovery be guided towards an entire different direction.

Generation by generation keeps pondering, but the only main fact of survival in any forms that blinds further away from the actual discovery itself. Could it be true that thoughts of many may be the reason towards why new discoveries or insights of what is, is in fact, actually, it’s opposite.

Why not be, a generation that change’s the ills of human disgust and anger. How does any nation truly measure how well society has truly and deeply grasp the whole concept of being alive? It does not show that man has learnt much, yet his potential to actually change the tide of what is forecast to become is so close in grasp. It is our ways that change to be arrogance and it is also our ways that make men kind.

By Anggoron Azid

In the past few month one has notice that similar aspects in what could be agreed to be the overall practice towards workers in the entire nation is the same.

Meaning to say that the notion that intellectual stimulus should not be practice and if so not in accordance to the progress of the purpose to upgrade the ability of using “the brain”.

Let us take a simple example, within any organization there are many levels of departments. Thus each department has its superiors and subordinates. Based on certain objectives that are wanted by any organization to meet its goals, there is bound to be transfer of skills, knowledge and the methodology of creative thinking. Now if one consciously try’s to observe or maybe find statistics on how much effort is put on just understanding of what should be done to that of preparation, in creating employees with analytical frame of mind, than one sense that very minimal effort is on the creation of analytical thought but more on just “ don’t think but do”.

Now let us picture this in a larger scale, if the minds of the locals is to just to accept the ways of what should be done without explanation, nor explanations to why things are done than basically the entire employers of the nation is purposely creating a generation of “ un-minded zombies”. The impact of such practices will have no advantages to the locals, thus creating a generation of “peoples whom do not understand objective, via explanation thus unable to solve problems at the most practical essence of the term itself.

For every action done by senior members will be based on previous frame of practices which disables the capability of creating next generation’s of new creative and analytical thinkers.

Why is this done? Simple it is because “these groups” do not want Malaysia to progress in thought. Like wise if such practices were to be done, than the potential of the Malaysian citizen itself will have tremendous progress both mental maturity, hypothesis of varieties and enabling progress of thought itself. Thus

That is why progress can only be seen at physical attributes but what about progress on how objectivity coincides with strong analytical mental capacity on each individual citizens of Malaysia itself.

Wouldn’t such precise planning on the overall scale be of advantage to nations other Malaysia itself? In order to create a new breed of Malaysian thinkers that have relevance on the international playing field this whole way of how employees are molded must be changed. Currently many have accepted such ways which one see’s as not only helping to degrade each Malaysian individuals potential but instead making confirmation that Malaysia will only see progress on the surface.

For all the local superiors in each individual company whom has power, honestly try to visualize to what extend are one’s employees mental intellectual progress in the true meaning. Do one see’s , one’s staff turning into pure “follow the way” or does one truly see the potential capability of intelligence in each of one’s employee? Than honesty  ask oneself  whether current practice imposed on each staff of the many organizations will help create Malaysian citizen that can truly think of vice – versa.

If the Malaysian government can some how change his current habitual and accepted ways than the future true potential of the Malaysian mind will probably see its fruits later down the years.

THE BOTTOM LINE IS DO NOT LET MALAYSIAN CITIZENS (LOCALS) LEARN HOW TO THINK! THAT IS “THEIR” OBJECTIVE.

So all the impose practice will follow such guidelines to insure the overall objective reaches through out generation by generation especially towards local Malaysians

By Anggoron Azid

The real reason members of parliment in Malaysia cut’s in on speeches is solely because they

all have a piece of the cake. Now if anyone talks about issues concerning  their peace of their cake then?  logically they will try to cut or disrupt the speaker. Plain simple.

They all are not Gandhi where nothing is at stake (personal). One challenges members of parliment

to try living on  RM5 for a week and drop all their income input.Then they’ll soon see a diffirent picture.

So stop all this acting and do your job as the so called intellectuals by using the honest heart and not deception.  CAN ONE TRULY DEBATE WITH A PURE CONCIOUS IF THEIR IS A PERSONAL STAKE AT HAND?

What do those members of parliment  think? that  their are no intellectuals out their watching your every move.

Nope! deception doesn’t work that easily in todays age of time.

By Anggoron Azid

One is really tired thus pondering this issue is basically the icing to compliment it even worse. Again let us sit back and see what’s going on. First let’s take a good look at the master minds or main actors. Firstly one apologizes for the not placing titles to the actors of concern. (It’ll just take up space) The main characters which  undeniable is of course, our current PM, then  Najib, then the potential leaders in the future which of course is Khairy, Mukriz, Hishamuddin and or maybe even KULI  to a certain extent. The other main figures that will create objective havoc off course is Dr Mahathir, Samy Vellu (predicaments in MIC) and the quite observable MCA decision makers. Amongst all these character, one ponders only one question which is what their main objective is. Is it personal motivated, group motivated or honestly trying to do good for the citizens of Malaysia? If one takes notice, currently much uncanny events are occurring. WHAT ARE THEY? Well for one the citizen have become more aggressive in viewing their discontent. Why? Is it because they feel that the current government is being more open or soft or is it just because Malaysian society has become more educated and matured (aggressive in nature)? Either way a question that many would probably liked answered is whether the current PM is truly truthful and genuine in integrity. If so true, the main objective is to help the poor or layman then much discontent will arise from mid range power players. Why? Well because, their slice of the cake is now headed for the poor. This will occur only if honesty in trying to help the lower income group is valid. Whilst if such statement is to be not true and in actual it is vice versa then off course retired bench makers will automatically arise plus as well, the lower income group. But this too is worth studying. Why? Well if their rise (retired power players) is solely for personal contentment then fault will basically lie on both sides of the fence also.

At this moment the layman seems to be fed negative statement degrading either side making things to be even worse. In this day and age wealth somehow is required to compliment objective of whatever task. That is, what makes today so potentially dangerous. Whilst the Malay ponder issues of “control”, the Indians (MIC) and Chinese (MCA) too have conflict with previous “taiko’s” thus preventing new form of take over in today’s ways of thought. This is why many allegations of various topics are zooming out in all directions. The opposition party would definitely take such current predicaments towards their advantage. Especially to create even more havoc state between current ruling party components. Thou, one still is worried about why there has been little news on Anwars activities. Especially in current media. Why?  One wonders?

All in all, the entire layman would probably see all the various change of events to be very disturbing. Take note foreign investors, if are aggressively investing, does not necessarily mean that they are solely here to invest, but in contrary is using this opportunity for even more important agendas globally.

All in all, something must be done to “Truly Draw a line of what can be done and what cannot be done” Why? It’s because pure plain “control”. Why do parents control their young ones? Mainly, it is to show that respect must be there and also to state “don’t ever cross the line!” NOTE” this view is from a layman! Thus as a layman, many for seen that one are not worth hearing. So presentation wise, expect what one expects.

 So basically stop all this acting and be a “stern but fair parent”. And all sides must complement to insure that “the state of the nation is balanced” but is always “under control.”

By Anggoron Azid

The human soul is just a speak of much more that humans have yet to understand.
The relationship of doing good,  sometimes have no relevance to current thoughts of today.
To say humans are not cruel is an understatement. One’s with power and one’s whom is suffering
is the reality of life itself.To care or not may never be in the hearts of modern day man.Anggoron cannot deny that man is not perfect but knowing that trying to do good may  help change the outcome of future generation’s  is a drive on its own. Anggoron hope’s it will also be  the drive of current day minds. For if man decide’s on doing its opposite than the shift of balance to becoming even more cruel will undoubtably cause more souls to ponder suffering as their daily meals.Life itself is so short, yet time spent on  trully fullfilling life gets even shorter due too the norms of current societies itself.

Anggoron once ponded thoughts on past activities of our fore fathers . Amongst which a question did arise, what activity of the past that once prevail has perish in this current day?The hermit of european countries, the monks of China and the Malays whom “bertapa”. One cannot deny that  these activities where vastly present. especially during those days. Anggoron question that amongst them whom had gone through such activities what experience or knowledge did they truly gain? Anggoron than ponders on ,that , in this current times and age, could one seek such characters and as question upon them of what they have gained. The answer is a definite no. Why is it that in current times such characters whom goes through such endeavors do not exit? Yet during our fore fathers time such characters did exist. What change the human activities that systematically denied any oppurtunity of even experiencing such a process?  Will current generations ever find out the secret or experiences obtained in the so called practice of “betapa” itself. In today’s science many items of physical achievements can be drawn out but what of the experience or gains obtained by previous souls which has relationship to “betapa” itself. How could modern day society define or explain its process when no such characters exist today?

Having finished my usual “Teh Tarik”, anggoron, while viewing the local news
ponder one the natural disaster that hit China. The reporter stated that the potential of over
50 thousands lives could be at stake.

At that particular moment another news report stating conflict in another remote nation where killings
 causing human casualties had hit to thousands.

The main difference between these two occurance is that death to human lives where cause by ;

1. Natural disaster (quite difficult to avoid)
2. Human conflict killing one another.

What anggoron viewed was if those people in the dispute of disagreementin the variuos nations where killing one another where to be hit by an earth quake similar to that of China , anggoron wounders? would they still have a similiar perspective on casualties caused by killing one another by gun fire?

Maybe if humans, killed by human nature has a different message compare to humans killing each other in conflict by gunfire.Now anggoron wounders if the conflicting groups feels that they (their group) still feels tough or powerful if compare to the grasp of human nature itself.

Now both sides of the coin of any conflicted nations, where killings occur by street fights, confrontation, etc can see for themselves what death looks like when nature takes over.

By Anggoron Azid

If any soldier wants to be in the elite force then get ready for ” hell.”
If not go join the cub scouts.The answer given by Datuk Abdul Rahim Dahalan  is
precise and meet’s the objectives.Malaysia does not want “faggets” to be
the protector of our nation.

If anyone applies to become a teacher, he or she is taught how to teach
effectively. If a person wants to be a in singer he or she takes vocal
lessons.

Now what does one think a Commando should be trained for? And how? Use
ones imagination and you’ll probably get the point.

So SYABAS to Datuk Abdul Rahim for his statement in the recent local
Malaysian dailies.

By Anggoron Azid

Take note, Malaysia will be controlled by votes (if truly honest in voting counts)

Thus let us presume that such counts are valid. If so “volume” will be a deciding factor.

Meaning, to say, the amount of human head count.

Now analyze, will the increase of foreign person of which will later on be able to gain citizenship be able to change the tide of volume of Malaysia natural habitants?

Another aspect to ponder is the local’s producing enough to ensure the percentage of natural locals will ensure population increment? (Volume of the population of the natural citizens)

 Why is this important? If the rate of non-bumi’s becoming citizens or producing children has a higher increment rate compared to the local bumi’s,  than it is certain that the increase of their volume per head will later on fill a higher amount of the entire population in Malaysia itself.

Thus during a voting poll, the advantage of volume could easily topple the natural inhabitants of that particular nation itself.

Meaning to say, if Malaysia is to sustain power in the hands of its true people than increment of non natural citizen must be observed carefully. A detailed true account of the statistics of the relationship of population increment of non-bumi to bumi’s will indeed be helpful.

Thus border control, immigration and documentation is not only for the sake of administration but much, much more.

GET THE DRIFT!

Human nature still prevails over all other forms of truth. Thus it can also be said that faces tells a million stories. To truly understand the on goings of the internal soul of the man itself one would definitely begin through his face. The contour of despair, sadness or even guilt would unknowingly prevail in the sense of the word. The tortured soul would state it all. And it is through ones face that what strength is truly present or if it too has died out.

Why do kings of the past whilst in their youth would be fed the knowledge of language, culture, the martial arts and the in depth knowledge of religion. Why do they ponder the arts whilst also learn the sciences? Why are they thought grace whilst being able to be stern at the right moment? And why do times when kings rule that their gaze could send shivers of fear or even emotions of respect? It because their faces prevail knowledge, strength and justice in true sense of the term and not of show.

Recently talk of how Malays must start to instill a sense of pride and believe in upholding the traditional livelihood of the Malay itself. It is anggorons belief that if such tidings are to be accomplished, than the heart and soul of the suggestion itself must be portrayed in the “faces” of the Malays itself.

How can ones face hide grief, despair, illiterate, unconfident and fear? On the other hand these faces too, can show courage, pride, patriotism and fearlessness with compassion.

Too truly see deep down how society of all cultures really feel, one must first look deep into the faces that past by during our stay on this humble earth. What is the picture described in faces of the current Malay society? Are they the same as when Malay warriors roam this blessed nation? Or are they just timid creature’s that follow the trend of time?

“Read not only the book of knowledge, read too the faces of nations and see what may the signs the shine either in despair or in courage”

by anggoron azid

By Anggoron Azid

The ability to understand each others “true” character is an understatement of far fetch implications towards the main motive. One main point that many may sometimes forget is that by doing what is un expected may in other ways cause different results in certain situations.

Let’s get the facts out. The formation of the current new parliamentary members from a more even mixture of previous lead coalition and that of the opposition did stir the soup itself.

Now the trick is to let what ever the opposition wants to do or say whilst calmly observing and not be intimidated by such actions or statements. Their main objective is to undermine their opponent’s emotional stability and that of how questions are answered.

Statements in local dailies of how arrogant and rude opposition parties act as members of parliament should not be answered by just one individual but by the entire public. Thus banning a live parliamentary session on TV would only strengthen the public’s opinion on how il-educated the current holders of power are.

Let’s just say that the current commentary with regards to how questions or behavior on sensitive issues are being handled is truly idiotic, well then let the public decide.

How one defines truth is not only in physical action but is how one bring forth statues of being “cool” but decisive in the most intense situations.

The only set back is that, if the majority of the overall public themselves defines “truth” in a totally different manner than the actual sense of the word would never be truly clarified.